Completing The Model For Peace

Home Search Privacy Policy Contact Us

 

Home

Mr. Goodwin Visits Israel
Regional Peace Plan Update
Regional Peace Plan
How To Reach An Agreement
Completing The Model For Peace

Copyright © 1999-2008 Middle East Peace Dialogue Network. All rights reserved.
Revised: April 01, 2008 .

How to Reach an Agreement in 2008

 

A Project Proposal
Presented by the H. L. Education for Peace, Ltd. (Geneva Initiative, Israel)

in partnership with

the Economic Cooperation Foundation (ECF) Tel Aviv

 

Requested assistance:
US $l,OOO,OOO

 

Project duration: June 2007 -May 2008


 

I. Executive Summary

The aim of this project is to complete the model for Israeli-Palestinian peace. Focusing, first and foremost, on Jerusalem, the Palestinian refugees, and the question of Palestinian prisoners, this project will continue the work begun by the Geneva Initiative, and fill in the missing details for all d1e key issues that would underlie a peace agreement between Israel and Palestine. Additional issues will also be explored, including the environment and water.

Work on this project will be carried out by HL. Education for Peace, Ltd. (or, "Geneva Initiative, Israel"), in partnership with the Economic Cooperation Foundation (ECF). The two organizations will draw on their unique expertise to undertake the research, analysis, and the creative thinking and drafting that will constitute detailed, viable, and comprehensive solutions to the issues at hand. An additional component of the project will be public education and dissemination of the work accomplished. To this effect, additional partners will include Neve Shalom and a recently founded company headed by Mohammad Darawshe, Mohammad Darawshe Consulting and Public Relations, which is establishing itself as a leader in raising awareness of existing solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, especially the Geneva Initiative.

Much of the work will be done in working groups of experts, including Palestinians who participated in the work leading up to the Geneva Initiative blueprint As part of the work, surveys and polls may be used to test or promote certain ideas. A large conference aimed at clearing public knowledge about different contents of our work is also envisaged. Although much of the work will be done locally, since for political and logistical reasons meetings involving both Israelis and Palestinians are often easier to hold outside the country, the project includes provisions for several seminars in Europe. An additional component will include consultation with senior international figures, both professional and political.

The expected duration of this project is 12 months, and its total budget is $1,000,000.

II. H. L. Education for Peace, Ltd. and ECF Organizational Profiles

H.L. Education for Peace Ltd. (aka The Geneva Initiative Israel): Since its establishment following the launching of the Geneva Initiative in December 2003, H. L. Education, Ltd has been the leading organization in Israel whose sole mission is the promotion of a permanent -status agreement between Israel and Palestine. In addition to promoting the Geneva Accord as a detailed blueprint of Israeli-Palestinian peace, Education for Peace has been working on bringing that moment of peace closer through various means all aimed at preparing the public opinion as well as the political leadership to accept the compromise required to solve the conflict. Directed by Gadi Baltiansky, a former senior diplomat in the Israeli foreign service and press secretary to Prime Minister Ehud Barak. Education for Peace  is a registered Not-for-profit Ltd Company (NPO). The organization has a professional Board of Directors, chaired by Mr. Baoz Karni, as well as standards for accounting, expenditures, reportage, as well as a steering committee which guides the work of the professional team.

The Economic Cooperation Foundation (ECF): The ECF was established in 1991 by Dr. Yossi Beilin and Dr. Yair Hirschfeld. and has a unique track record of contribution to the Middle East peace process. ECF's leaders were the "architects" and initiators of the "Oslo channel" that led to the Declaration of Principles in 1993, as well as of the "Stockholm Channel" that produced the Beilin-Abu-Mazen Understandings (1995) and the "EPS Model" on Israeli-Palestinian economic relations in Permanent Status (1998). Most recently, under the leadership of Dr. Beilin, the ECF was behind the first-ever detailed draft agreement for permanent status between Israel and the Palestinians, "The Geneva Initiative." All of these initiatives, including most specifically the most recent one, have served as the point-of-reference in all discussions on permanent status between the two sides. The ECF team is composed of young and dynamic professionals with considerable experience and know- how. The ECF is managed by Dr. Hirschfeld (Director General) and Mr. Boaz Karni (Treasurer) with Dr. Nimrod Novik as Chairperson and Dr. Beilin as Honorary Chairperson of the Board.

III. Project Rationale and Objectives

The collapse of the Camp David summit in July 2000 and the outbreak of the Intifadah in September of that year, brought about a period of violence and instilled the notion that a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians was impossible-and the conflict insoluble. Against this overriding sense of pessimism. the Geneva Initiative was launched by Yossi Beilin and Yasser Abed Rabbo in December 2003, and proposed a detailed blueprint for an Israeli-Palestinian permanent-status peace agreement. The blueprint, known as the Geneva Accord, was drafted and negotiated over the course of two and a half years by experts, former negotiators, senior reserve security establishment personnel, as well as sitting and former political office holders. By reaching a detailed model for a possible peace treaty, the Geneva Initiative challenged the notion that took root after Camp David -that there was no partner for negotiation and no plan for Israeli-Palestinian peace -by outlining the existence of actual solutions.

Since its launching the Geneva Initiative  has become the internationally recognized point of reference for the future Israeli-Palestine peace accord as well as a household name ;among Israelis and Palestinians. In fact, the Geneva Initiative has only widened its appeal overtime, both popularly and officially. Opinion pools among Israelis and Palestinians demonstrate the that roughly 70 percent of both populations would support an agreement based on the principles outlined in the Geneva Initiative. Meanwhile the officials from as far the political field as Europe, China, the United States and the Arab World have been making private as well as increasingly more public reference to the Geneva Initiative as the ultimate solution to the Israeli-Palestinain conflict. For one recent example, in a speech to a joint session of the U.S. . Congress on March 7, 2007, Jordan's King Abdullah referred to the Geneva Initiative as evidence that "the groundwork for a comprehensive final settlement is already in place,"  and as proof that the goal of lasting peace in the Middle East "is attainable".

Yet more work is required. For Israeli's past experiences in negotiations teaches us, peace efforts often fail due to lack of appropriate preparation. including detailed solutions to complicated problems. This was made evident most dramatically-and tragically-at the Camp David summit of July 2000. The aim of this project is to ensure that when the leaderships of both resume their negotiations on a comprehensive and lasting peace accord, detailed and agreed-upon solutions would be available to all the most contentious problems. Or in other words, that the next Camp David summit, whether in the Catoctin Mountains of Maryland or elsewhere, will have every reason to succeed.

In this respect, this project could be viewed as the third and final stage in the production of a complete and comprehensive model for peace between Israel and Palestine. For if the Clinton parameters and Taba negotiations (of December 2000 and January 2001 respectively) constituted the first part, and the launching of the Geneva Initiative (which was based on Clinton and Taba) in December 2003 constituted the second, then the completion of the Geneva Accord through the drafting of all the critical details is the third and last stage. Upon completion of this project, we aim to have all the answers to every possible question relating to all the key outstanding issues of the conflict.

IV. Project Description

The Geneva Initiative group and the ECF will utilize their pool of Israeli and international experts. including Palestinian and American. in order to focus and complete the solutions to all of the most contentious issues, including Jerusalem. the Palestinian refugees, and, what is slowly becoming an increasingly heated and politically pressing issue, the status of Palestinian prisoners. Additional work will done on other issues, including the environment and water.

Work on this project will be carried out by H.L. Education for Peace, Ltd. (aka The Geneva Initiative, Israel), in partnership with the Economic Cooperation Foundation (ECF). The two organizations will draw on their unique expertise to undertake the research, analysis, and the creative thinking and drafting in order to produce detailed, viable, and comprehensive solutions to the issues at hand. The work will be done in working groups of experts, many of whom participated in the negotiations that led up to the drafting of the Geneva Initiative blueprint. As part of the work, surveys and polls may be used to test or promote certain ideas, and other publication tools may prove necessary at different stages of this project. Although much of the work will be done locally, political and logistical reasons often make it difficult, occasionally even impossible, for Israelis and Palestinians to meet in Israel or Palestine. For this reason, some meetings may have to take place in a nearby destination outside the country, such as Cyprus, Turkey, or elsewhere in Europe. The project also envisions the need for extensive consultation with senior figures in international organizations, especially in the United States.

In material terms, the final product of this project will be a lengthy and detailed publication, which will constitute a complete model for a peace agreement between Israel and Palestine. Covering a whole range of issues, this publication will in effect be a kind of "library" of peace, and will be publicized as such. With a view toward publicizing this library of peace, a major component of this project will focus on the dissemination of the material and its ideas to different kinds of audiences, especially the general public. To this effect, additional partners to this project will include Neve Shalom and a recently founded company headed by Mohammad Darawshe, Mohammad Darawshe Consulting and Public Relations, which is establishing itself as a leader in raising awareness of existing solutions to the Israeli- Palestinian conflict, especially the Geneva Initiative.

(A Note on the limits publication: The project directors may judge that some components in their work require discretion. The need for such discretion is envisioned with respect to certain elements underlying the solution to the Palestinian refugees, especially regarding different financial evaluations as well as compensation schemes that could be used in the context of a peace agreement. That said, the thrust of the agreement on the refugees can still be promoted in a variety of ways, such as by highlighting to the Israeli public the significance of the refugee problem to the Palestinian ethos, and more.)

Below are two examples illustrating the level of resolution that will characterize the work of this project. Example A describes the kind of work we will be doing on the solution for Jerusalem. Example B describes the work we will be doing on the question of the Palestinian prisoners.

Example A: Filling in the Details for Jerusalem

One of the most contested issues, and arguably the main stumbling block in the Camp David summit of July 2000, the future of Jerusalem requires a carefully detailed,  meticulous and exhaustive plan if agreement is to be reached.

The Geneva accord proposes such a plan,  whose principles call for the division of the city into two separate entities with controlled crossing points between the two sides. The division of Jerusalem is not virtual. A physical border will mark the division between the two cities, but it ,will be the user and environmentally friendly. According to Geneva, in order to create for territorial continuity within each part of the city, a series of roads will connect between the Arab neighborhoods and another series of road will connect between the Jewish neighborhoods, and citizens of Israel or Palestine will be able to move freely within the territory of their sovereign country.  The plan includes detailed solutions to the area of the al-Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount as ,well as for the Old City. which will be a free and open city.

Given the intricacy of the solution, which only reflects the complexity of the problem, further work is still required to elaborate on the fill in key provisions, especially with respect to the structure and administration of the border regime in Jerusalem. Such a regime must take into account the specific needs of Jerusalem as a continuous urban space, all while ensuring the easy flow of people and goods through all parts of the city. Of special concern are the arrangements guiding the entry and exit points into and from the Old City, which must ensure the movement within the Old City is free and unimpeded without compromising the security needs of both sides are not compromised. Additional work must specify the rules and regulations pertaining to the various holy sites in order to guarantee free access and worship, as well as to other sites of great sensitivity, such as the Mount of Olives and Mount Zion cemeteries, in order to ensure the continuation of current burial and visitation practices.  Additional work must focus on arrangements for guaranteeing access, freedom of movement, and security for Israelis from the Jaffa Gate to the Zion Gate.

It should be noted that the completion of specifications for the border regime in Jerusalem will effectively resolve all remaining questions pertaining to the border regime between the two future states. Since Jerusalem offers the most difficult site for resolving the questions governing the passage of people and goods between the neighboring sovereign nations, any solution to Jerusalem will obviate questions relating to the border regime everywhere else.

 

Example B: Filling in the Details on the Palestinian Prisoners

 The question of the Palestinian prisoners has been one of the most sensitive issues in the Israeli-Palestinian  negotiations since their inception in the Oslo process. At the present time (May 2007), Israel holds roughly 13,00 Palestinian prisoners, the vast majority of whom are defined as "security prisoners", while the rest fall into the categories of "criminal" or "administrative," or are left undefined. While the issue of massive release of Palestinian prisoners tears Israeli society, for the Palestinians this issue enjoys an overwhelming consensus.

The release of prisoners has been a central issue to the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians from the very start, and Israel did in fact allow for a gradual release of prisoners as part of the Oslo process during the 1990's. But the collapse of the Camp David summit of July 200 and the outbreak of the Palestinian Infitdah have frozen the release of prisoners, and the issue has assumed an increasing importance over the past six years, and may even be deemed today the most sensitive issue for the "Palestinian street," arguably perhaps emotionally urgent and politically pressing than even the question of refugees or the future of Jerusalem.  The rise of Hamas, which is particularly sensitive to popular opinion and many of whose members are in Israeli prisons, has further elevated the issue to the political frontline, with prisoners themselves playing an increasingly active role.   Thus, the so-called "prisoners Document" was influential in developing the process of national dialogue the ultimately led to the Mecca Agreement and the establishment of the Palestinian National Unity Government. And the plight of the Palestinian prisoners will no doubt remain central to any agreement, whether the interim or permanent, between Israel and Palestinians.

With this view, the Geneva Accord has dedicated an entire chapter (Article 15) to the issue of "Palestinian Prisoners and Detainees."  The Accord stipulates the release of all Palestinian and Arab prisoners who are detained in the framework of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and whose groups these prisoners fall into three categories: A) all persons imprisoned prior to the start of the implementation of the Declaration of Principles on May 4, 1994m administrative detainees, and minors, as well as women, and prisoners in ill health shall be released immediately upon entry into force of this Agreement; B) all persons imprisoned after May 4, 1994 and prior to the signature of this Agreement; and C) Exceptional cases -  persons whose names are set forth in a separate Annex, and who shall be released in thirty months at the end of the full implementation of the territorial aspects of the peace agreement.

 

V. Cost budget and financing plan

The total cost for this project is US $1,000,000. A rough outline for the budget delineated below.

Preparation of material, including:

Experts fees Research

Surveys and polls

Travel (local and international)

Meetings and workshops

Dissemination

Publication

Public education campaign Seminars

Conference

Total Project Cost  $1,000,000

(including office expenses and overhead of 8.5%)

Up ] Mr. Goodwin Visits Israel ] Regional Peace Plan Update ] Regional Peace Plan ] How To Reach An Agreement ] [ Completing The Model For Peace ]

 

Middle East Peace Dialogue Network, Inc.

200 Country Club Parkway, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054

Tel. 856-235-3111, Fax: 856-234-9180, Email mepdn@comcast.net, www.mpdn.org

"You" can make a difference by supporting Peace in the Middle East!

100% of your "Tax Deductible" donation will go directly to support peace in the Middle East. Middle East Peace Dialogue Network is a not-for-profit organization with 501(c)(3) status under Internal Revenue Code.

Back Home Up

Founder ] Press Release ] The Peace Poem ] Unsung Hero ] We Need Your Help ] Activities ] Support Peace ] Links ] Special Events ] Recommended Reading ]

Home Up Search Privacy Policy Contact Us

 

 

Google

 

 

 

 

Member Of

Search By County on Your Local County Yellow Pages for Completing The Model For Peace.
Bringing Local Consumers together with local Completing The Model For Peace businesses!
 Or, try Your Philly Web, Your Local Network & Your County Yellow Pages  Free Ads & Free Stuff on Your Free Network.

Alabama  Alaska  Arizona  Arkansas  California  Colorado  Connecticut  Delaware  Florida  Georgia  Hawaii Idaho  Illinois  Indiana  Iowa  Kansas  Kentucky  Louisiana 
Maine  Maryland 
Massachusetts  Michigan  Minnesota  Mississippi  Missouri  Montana  Nebraska  Nevada  New Hampshire  New Jersey  New Mexico  New York
North Carolina  North Dakota  Ohio  Oklahoma  Oregon  Pennsylvania  Rhode Island

Max Automotive * Max Contractors * Max Day Care Centers * Max Insurance * Max Legal Network 
Max Medical Network * Max Mitzvahs * Max Limo Network * Max Mortgages * Max Real Estate * Max Travel
Max Weddings Max Jewelers Network  * Max Catering Network

Powered by MAX

Website Designed by MAX